The ice ages of the Earth, as partly determined by this radioactive measurement, are a good example of the distortion I'm talking about.

The ice ages become increasingly far apart and last for longer periods as they go further back in time. They also appear to be more widespread over the globe. But I think this may be a reverse situation to a situation I have outlined in 'Mars Mission'. In terms of the unawareness of expansion or contracton as possibilites, the standard practice of collating data on a constant diameter is a misleading factor which misinterprets the positionings of former ice sheets occuring on a changing sphere ( see: 'Mars Mission-18: Polar Regions' ).

I suggest that the ice ages come at regular intervals and are of similar intensity, but the globe that they occur on has been increasing and the record of the time periods involved slows down as we go back in time ( the slowing relative to the ncrease in sphere - i.e. the 'unknown factor' ).